So when Riverside Country Supervisors pass an ordinance instigated by Supervisor Jeff Stone's comrades from the local Scientology slave labor compound known as "Gold", who are you going to call when protesters are arrested in the area the Supervisors said would not be effected by the legislation for targeted residential picketing?
- Tommy Davis, the current favor sock puppet PR jockey for the commercial empire that calls itself a church. OR...
- The local Cult-friendly County Mounties from the Sheriff's Department.
- How about Both?
If you guessed option 3, then congratulations - you've been paying attention to what one resident who commented on yesterday as "Chicago-style politics" during the epitome of incompetence that happened when the Riverside County passed Ordinance 884.
Highlighted in the photo below from AngryGayPope, Tommy Davis and Catherine Fraser discuss the semantics of which peaceful protester would get bagged in the immediate wake of the latest chapter of County Supervisor Jeff Stone's Footbullet Fiasco following the meeting.
Pre-show Theatrics served ala Fraser
Prior to this parade of injustice carried out as the Sheriffs department blocked the entry way to the cult compound, Catherine Fraser pictured above on the right clutching a stack of papers, had made the following remarks during the most recent chapter of the ongoing Riverside County meetings.
I just love this culties use of "vexatious litigant" as she winds up to do her part of spinning the usual Scientology Dead Agenting campaign against their so called "SPs" or perceived enemies. Ironic how the first thing out of their mouthpieces is always accusations of the dirty tricks the organization has mastered themselves decades ago.
Despite having the breaks clamped down on her spin doctoring at the meeting by County Supervisors, it seems that ultimately Catherine would make sure she had the last laugh when the protesters who attended the meeting showed up to peacefully demonstrate their concerns regarding the cult's coercive practices and abusive policies.
Act One - Featuring Tommy Davis Corruption Du Jour
The following videos captured what happened next.
Mark Lowell Arrested at Gold Base from Angry Gay Pope on Vimeo.
Mark Lowell is arrested at Gold Base for doing nothing more than being there. This after the Riverside Board of Supers said we could protest here unmolested. The police went out of their way to nag the small group of victims' rights advocates until somebody got arrested.
The second half of an absurd video in which the police fish around for reasons to arrest people until they semi-randomly arrest Mark Bunker aka Wise Beard Man. AKA Emmy award winning long time Scientology protester who has tangled with them legally before.
As explained in the video above, Supervisor Stone actually got something right for once - ordinance 884 would not be used to arrest protesters as Scientology's armed compound. At least not on this day.
Act Two - Classic Fair Game Showcase
Instead, the cult's guard shack lackey Catherine Fraser made a CITIZENS ARREST on Wise Beard Man and one of his fellow protesters. The same bitch on wheels bent for vengence on the podium at the supervisors meeting that was later clutching a stack of papers while her and Tommy Davis negotiated the day's arrests with the Sheriffs who were blocking their driveway whilest coming to the destructive cult's rescue once again.
Hmmmmm. Makes one wonder just what were those papers Catherine was flailing before she had the Sheriffs issue her citizen's arrest on the peaceful protesters that were deemed to be "blocking ingress and egress of the driveway" according to the cop's allegations before the arrests. The photo below is a blown up version of those documents Catherine was using to brief the arresting officers, click image to enlarge if you wish to verify the simple facts found therein that are summarized below.
Upon closer inspection of this photo, the legalsleeze investigative unit of Anonymous discovered that Catherine's pre-arrest outline included the following information.
Intentional Interference with the Public or Public Employees
California Penal Code § 602.1. (a) Any person who intentionally interferes with any lawful business or occupation carried on by the owner or agent of a business establishment open to the public, by obstructing or intimidating those attempting to carry on business, or their customers, and who refuses to leave the premises of the business establishment after being requested to leave by the owner or the owner’s agent, or by a peace officer acting at the request of the owner or owner’s agent, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for up to 90 days, or by a fine of up to four hundred dollars ($400), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
(b) Any person who intentionally interferes with any lawful business carried on by the employees of a public agency open to the public, by obstructing or intimidating those attempting to carry on business, or those persons there to transact business with the public agency, and who refuses to leave the premises of the public agency after being requested to leave by the office manager or a supervisor of the public agency, or by a peace officer acting at the request of the office manager or a supervisor of the public agency, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for up to 90 days, or by a fine of up to four hundred dollars ($400), or by both that imprisonment and fine.
(c) This section shall not apply to any of the following persons: (1) Any person engaged in lawful labor union activities that are permitted to be carried out on the property by state or federal law. (2) Any person on the premises who is engaging in activities protected by the California Constitution or the United States Constitution.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to supersede the application of any other law.
Freeways and Expressways: Use Restrictions
California VEHICLE Code, § 21960: (a) The Department of Transportation and local authorities, by order, ordinance, or resolution, with respect to freeways, expressways, or designated portions thereof under their respective jurisdictions, to which vehicle access is completely or partially controlled, may prohibit or restrict the use of the freeways, expressways, or any portion thereof by pedestrians, bicycles or other nonmotorized traffic or by any person operating a motor-driven cycle, motorized bicycle, or motorized scooter. A prohibition or restriction pertaining to bicycles, motor-driven cycles, or motorized scooters shall be deemed to include motorized bicycles; and no person may operate a motorized bicycle wherever that prohibition or restriction is in force. Notwithstanding any provisions of any order, ordinance, or resolution to the contrary, the driver or passengers of a disabled vehicle stopped on a freeway or expressway may walk to the nearest exit, in either direction, on that side of the freeway or expressway upon which the vehicle is disabled, from which telephone or motor vehicle repair services are available.
(b) The prohibitory regulation authorized by subdivision (a) shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon any freeway or expressway and the approaches thereto. If any portion of a county freeway or expressway is contained within the limits of a city within the county, the county may erect signs on that portion as required under this subdivision if the ordinance has been approved by the city pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1730 of the Streets and Highways Code.
(c) No ordinance or resolution of local authorities shall apply to any state highway until the proposed ordinance or resolution has been presented to, and approved in writing by, the Department of Transportation.
(d) An ordinance or resolution adopted under this section on or after January 1, 2005, to prohibit pedestrian access to a county freeway or expressway shall not be effective unless it is supported by a finding by the local authority that the freeway or expressway does not have pedestrian facilities and pedestrian use would pose a safety risk to the pedestrian.
Act Three - The Trap is Sprung!
So as plainly seen the in the typed up dox in the Catherine photos, the cult was well prepared in advance for this confrontation and took great pains to instruct the Sheriffs how to do their jobs. Angry Gay Pope's raid report noted he witnessed Catherine point to the first innocuous protester standing nearby but well out of the way of the overbearing Sheriffs. But one can't help but wonder if Tommy Davis' orders as an executive-level representative of the Scientology Goon Squad included getting an Emmy award winning journalist falsely arrested once again under blatant collusion.
Oh the irony, the Tommy Davis trap to drive off the peaceful protesters from the cult's armed compound backfired big time when Mark Bunker got arrested. Yes you heard me, the trap - was trap!
How so you say? We now have three thoroughly documented cases of the tainted Sheriffs Department collaborating with the cult to do what they do best - suppress society's basic rights when others fail to recognize their totalitarian beliefs as an authority. Yes the list of "whats wrong with this picture" is a daunting to task to tally, but here are a few of the more delicious options that can be pursued.
US CODE: TITLE 18,241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death
US CODE: Title 42,1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
California Civil Rights Act, Section 52.3
(a) No governmental authority, or agent of a governmental authority, or person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, shall engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers that deprives any person of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States or by the Constitution or laws of California. (b) The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the name of the people to obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or practice of conduct specified in subdivision (a), whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of subdivision (a) has occurred.
Now granted, any time Tommy Davis the liar shows up, the footbullets of utter stupidity rain down by the truckload. Pity his mother Anne Archer the actress sold his soul to the Sea Org rather than allowing him to go college like a rich, responsible parent who cares for her son's future should... or else he might actually have a clue what is in store for him as party to the corruption of the local police force.
In hindsight, this whole escapade of fail paints Mark Bunker's comments at the Supervisor's Meeting in somewhat eerie deja vu light as seen in the following clip.
Parting Shots - LOL Standing Ovation
Thus, the next chapter of Scientology's Corruption of Riverside wraps up into an entertaining 3 part play, albeit the utter stupidity of is shocking. Desparate cult is desparate. Some highlights from the legendary anti-Scientology attorney and fellow protester Graham Berry are as follows.
I will post at greater length later but the two Marks have been subjected to a citizens arrest for trespassing on what is clearly public property. As importantly, they were arrested in the same location that Scientology's own attorney stated was public property available for picketing. Suffice it to say it is going to be a huge footbullet for the cult and some of the Supervisors. There is talk of a petition to recall Supervisor Stone for a recall election.
This is so outrageous that on the way back AGP and I went to L. Ron Hubbard Way and spent half an hour picketing Big Blue where they all ran inside like rats off a sinking ship.
The first court appearance for the two Marks is April 28.
Graham's Full Raid Report - Part 1
Graham's Full Raid Report - Part 2
Pay Attention Cult. You have now handed us the third Riverside lawsuit where your ruthless history and unethical practices will be picked apart on a public stage while Tommy Davis' ass is on a silver platter via Catherine Fraser's vindictive actions.
"Somebody some day will say 'this is illegal'. By then be sure the orgs say what is legal or not." -- L. Ron Hubbard, HCOPL 4 January 1966
Because of this failure, you were doomed to have Gold Base fall under close scrutiny ever since your raging lunatic security guards viciously manhandled a protester and pinned him to the ground during the first citizen arrest in the exact location the Riverside Supervisor repeatedly insisted the activists should use for protesting as it legally allowed under the temporary 888 ordinance. You have now amplified your doom tenfold by once again claiming public property as their own in these latest citizen's arrests for trespassing on public highway.
KINDRED BACK MATTER